Showing 24 results

Weissberger writes that Eileen's letter "would do a lawyer credit". They must follow Milmo's conclusion. Their only way to get at Wolfit is via Minster to the Society of West End Theatre Managers. Thinks there is a cause of action for damages, although it would be difficult for Beaton to prove what the damages were. By bringing the action they would have a privileged document that the press could publish.

Weissberger thanks Eileen for sending copy of her letter dated 14 Oct. Eileen's letter to Beaton was an exceptionally well written document coming from a non-lawyer. Subscribes to Milmo's conclusions.

Weissberger writes that Beaton showed him her letter. If the statement to Equity is not a privileged communication, Weissberger agrees with Milmo that it shouldn't be sent, as Beaton would risk an action for libel. Beaton could tone down the document and send it to Minster to present to the Council of Theatre Managers in London. "Virtual blackmail" could be changed to "indirect pressure". Beaton is afraid however that Minster will be half-hearted about this. He wishes to do his utmost to expose Wolfit's misconduct to the public. Weissberger suggests suing for damages so that the press would report it. Mr Brendan Smith of the Dublin International Theatre Festival is reported in the Irish Independent of Sep. 22 to have said that Wolfit's statements made people think that the play was bad "with the result that many stayed away". Although Beaton wants to see Wolfit dealt with he does not want to involve himself in extravagant expenditures.

Weissberger writes that reading the reviews have made him realise he had lost perspective on the play, which can still be improved. He feels though that the critics are harsher with the play because the name Cecil Beaton is attached to it. He is sending Philippe de Croisset a cheque for 51,000 francs.

Typescript letter, regarding his discussion with Irene Selznick over her decision not to re-use the décor from the American version of "The Chalk Garden" for the London production.

Typescript letter, regarding the set designs for the English production of "The Chalk Garden".

Typescript letter, in which Weissberger discusses initial arrangements for Beaton's contract for work on the musical, "Little Glass Clock".

Typescript letter, regarding the set designs for the English production of "The Chalk Garden".

Typewritten letter, in which Weissberger confirms that he has consummated the contract for "Portrait of a Lady", and outlines the financial details queried by Austin & Noyes in connection with "The Chalk Garden". Weissberger concludes that in addition to the monetary reward, Beaton will benefit from his prominent association with both productions in terms of his reputation.

A letter to Oscar Olsen, c/o Austin & Noyes, from Arnold Weissberger. Concerns Beaton's contract as Costume Designer for "Portrait of a Lady".