Showing 214 results

Manuscript letter, in which Glover writes that he intended to write to Carlile before, but that he has been distracted by the election of a new Master and other distractions. Tells Carlile to cut the hotel in London on Tuesday and to come to Cambridge, as he did before.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover writes that he is glad that Carlile took Elizabeth's articles. He thinks that they are straight, clear and effective. Elizabeth was with them yesterday for part of the day. Glover hopes that they will use all four articles, especially the article concerning her work with prostitutes, though he fears that Carlile thinks that the Baptists would not wish to know about it. Elizabeth was with them because Mrs Glover is standing for the town council, not on a party nomination, but on behalf of the "Women's Citizens Committee". The dining room is full of rubber bands, canvas, voters' lists, waster-paper baskets, etc. Glover is not there, but in College, with pupils to come and lectures not read for next term. Glover adds that Elizabeth managed to obtain a sewing machine for an old lady, given by someone in response to a request printed in 'The British Weekly'. Glover asks whether Carlile or the Secretary's Chair could say that gifts for her work should not be sent to the Editor of 'The Baptist Times' nor the Church House?

Manuscript letter, in which Glover writes that he has read the chapter again and has made a few passing comments. His general criticism is that Carlile presents the incidents of the quarrel, but does not handle the issue. The questions before an historical jury would be: was Spurgeon justified in his charges against the Baptist ministry? Answer: No. Did he behave as a Christian man ought to towards old friends and colleagues? Answer: No. Did he really take the trouble to examine the evidence and understand the issue? Answer: No. Had he any reason to complain of S.H. Booth? Yes. This does not constitute an acquittal. Carlile's chapter reads rather like a dismissal of the case. Was there any justification for Spurgeon's sweeping changes? Carlile does not handle the historical question in the chapter. For he likes Spurgeon and his liking stops his mouth. It has been kind of Carlile to ask for Glover's opinion, but in view of his feelings on the issue, it would be better if Carlile did not mention him by name in the preface, since Glover cannot endorse the chapter, nor subscribe to the book as a whole. There are many people who would be happier if Glover were to keep away the book altogether. He had a pleasant time at Bangor.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover offers criticism of the manuscript chapter on "The Downgrade" which Carlile sent to him. Glover doesn't like it. The statements are vague; no attempt appears to have been made to identify sources, or the value of the charges, or the range of people accused. Broadly, Glover does not think Carlile does much to help Spurgeon's case (the Baptist preacher, Charles Haddon Spurgeon, 1834-1892). Two points only are made to mitigate it, namely S.H. Booth and oversight from bad health. Glover offers two suggestions: to those who dislike Spurgeon, this will be welcome evidence of narrowness and lack of judgement. Secondly, it is a pity that a man like Carlile should be considered vague and uncritical by others. Glover doesn't want to write all this. If Carlile does not like this letter, Glover will understand, but he hopes that his dislike will not extend to its author.

Published 1932.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover asks Carlile not to worry about the omission of details of Glover's engagements in the 'Baptist Times'. Students and dons are scattering for Christmas. While Glover is not theoretically working, he is reading for some lectures next term. The children have begun to gather at home; Glover's sisters arrive tomorrow. Richard is at Harvard, so will not be with them. The Londonderry reception was not to his taste: Glover passed by, shook hands, examined the pictures and then fled. He wants to know what Le Quesne, Martin and others consider their attitude and responsibility to other Baptist Unions. The Council may have already given itself away and have had its position decided for it. At any rate, Glover is uneasy and unhappy. Asks to be remembered to Mrs Carlile and to the Huxleys when they arrive.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover thanks Carlile for his letter and for the copy of a review in the 'Baptist Times'. He is glad to learn that several men in Cambridge beyond his intimate circle of friends, have found 'Greek Byways' (1932) readable - Carlile's evidence confirms this further, so Glover draws courage. He asks to be remembered to Mrs Carlile.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover confirms that he has read through Carlile's typescript book and now offers, with some difficulty, criticism of it as requested. The latter section is better than the second section, since its purpose is much clearer. He found it difficult to link the paragraphs of the earlier sections, though this may be his own fault, since he has had to contend with many distractions; Carlile should disregard what he says. The overture makes the point vividly, but the following two sections lack fusion. He suggests a re-arrangement of parts. As to the detail, Glover hesitates about the use of the Fourth Gospel. The hymn chapter wavers a bit towards the end. Other comments aside, he has from Bristol further news concerning Buchmanism and has heard that it is splitting the old Union. He had a long talk with Bishop John Taylor Smith (1860-1938) about it yesterday. They carried their objection to the fresh opening of pubs, but how he hates being in a court among publicans and their solicitors on market day, when the crowds come in. Glover confesses to being a snob and a don and a recluse.

Manuscript letter, in which Glover notes that Carlile has had several articles about Frank Buchman (1878-1961) and Buchmanism. Glover has known Buchman since 1914 or 1915, and has been friendly with him, though they are by no means close. Glover lived as a guest with a group of his followers at Yale, from November 1928 to January 1929. It was after Glover's operation and they treated him kindly. But for reasons he will explain, many features of Buchmanism won't do. Its advantages are that it is a good way of getting conversions and establishing affection inside the group. Its disadvantages are that the method of open confession is foolish and not particularly desirable.